Thursday, February 01, 2007
One more thing . . .
OK, so this may seem like I am obsessing, but there has been one other question that has been nagging me with this whole bulletin (I am no longer capitalizing the word). I wonder how much responsiblity we as pastors should take when a group of congregational member's focus is so out of whack. Andy Stanley has said something along the lines of "you are achieving the results that you are set up for" (I have totally butchered that, but you get the point). Are we preaching, teaching, programming, etc. in such a way that we should expect nothing less (or more) than what we see reflected in our congregations? Is this what keeping the status quo is going to produce? Is the way we are doing church not just making it comfortable for congregants to stay self-centered and me-oriented but encouraging it as well? In some ways I think the answer to these questions is obvious but very uncomfortable, and I am afraid we don't ask these questions enough for that very reason!
2 comments:
You made it 2 posts so i will give 2 ideas. As you know we are reading screwtape and this kinda reminds me of that. Doesn't matter what the issue, just as long as we can keep the church busy dealing with it instead of moving on and trying to do what their are there for. I am assuming you are upset about this because there have been meetings of some sort about it or it keeps getting brought up for some reason. Seems to me who ever cooked this up is probably pretty happy how much time the church is spending on it. PS you know i love you don't kill me.
point taken and ready to move on!
Post a Comment